|
| |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Check out the suspected real motive behind this ban.
With tuna ban, 150,000 may lose jobs
Philippine Daily Inquirer
DAVAO CITY—At least 150,000 people who depend on the tuna industry in General Santos City could end up jobless as a result of a two-year ban on tuna fishing in Western and Central Pacific, a fishing magnate said.
The ban, which was decided upon by the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), started on Jan. 1 and did not exempt purse seine fishing, which is used by most of the fishermen based in General Santos City.
Marfin Tan, president of the Socsksargen Fishing Federation and Allied Industries Inc. (SFFAII), said the ban would render idle at least 200 fishing boats.
Because of the commission’s decision, apparently prompted by over-fishing of tuna, the Philippine fishing industry has projected a 20 percent drop in tuna supply in the local and world markets.
$380-M industry
The tuna industry in General Santos is valued at $380 million based on annual export figures of 400 metric tons.
An official of the US-funded Growth with Equity in Mindanao had previously estimated that 60 percent of the city’s annual tuna catch came from foreign waters.
Stanley N. Swerdloff, GEM senior fisheries advisor in 2002, said that access to tuna-rich fishing grounds in neighboring countries was important to the tuna industry in General Santos.
“Tuna is responsible for almost $1 billion circulating in the national economy, much of it goes to Mindanao,” he had said.
Disturbing
“For our projection this year, the tuna catch will lie low by 20 percent during the first quarter. Fishermen, who are affected by the closure of the high seas, will have to look for other fishing grounds to compensate their losses,” Tan said.
He said the government could still remedy the situation by forging bilateral agreements with other countries in terms of sharing the ocean’s resources.
Undersecretary Virgilio Leyretana, head of the Mindanao Economic Development Council (Medco), said the closure of the high seas was disturbing because it would eventually hurt the economic stability of Mindanao.
“The closure will not only affect the fishermen but also auxiliary businesses related to the cannery business. On top of this, the revenue generation of the local government units concerned will also be in peril,” he said.
Leyretana said that if countries, where Filipino fishermen have ventured into, also decided to close their territorial waters, the problem would get worse.
Real motive
Tan earlier said the ban—covering areas parallel to Palau, above Papua New Guinea and below Micronesia and near the Solomon Islands—was supposedly to preserve whatever tuna is left in the seas.
But he said he suspected that it was aimed at dislodging the Philippines and other Third World countries from tuna fishing grounds.
“I suspect big countries, in the guise of conserving and preserving the remaining marine resources in the area, wanted to control the international fishing grounds because their own fishing grounds are already depleted,” Tan said.
He said Western and European countries had all the means to wrestle control of international fishing grounds.At least 60 percent of international tuna supply comes from the western and central Pacific. Judy Quiros, Inquirer Mindanao
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I am assuming this ban is for commercial fishers only, am I right? It could be good for recreational anglers then. but as we know, bans don't really mean much since implementation of the ban is lacking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, this is a commercial fishing ban.
The main problem is, the most affected are the poor fishermen who are only acting as "hired assassins" of big and greedy commercial fishing companies.
I have read some in the Inquirer, that Taiwan has started recruiting fishermen from the Phils. who were affected by the ban.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| its good in a way that fish would be able to recover from the onslaught of commercial fishing. well there wont be any industry if they don't do anything about it and do you know that 90% of the large fish in the ocean are gone there are more trash being dumped in the ocean than fish being caught.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
if i understood correctly, fishing with hook and line isn't banned. even for commercial operations.
that kind of reaction is to be expected. how typical, just because they are heavily affected by the ban, they say it's a conspiracy na agad. Filipinos should not think like that. ehem ehem.
if ever it's true, wealthy countries can't pull it off without any alarm bells ringing. any sudden increase in their production will look very suspicious. these nations are what the are because of discipline.
the stakeholders should watch the chinese instead. they are the ones who have no respect for international waters. big chance many of them will take advantage of the situation. no competiton from other nations means they will have all the fish for themselves. disclaimer - i have nothing against the chinese as a nation, just the ones who do illegal stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
